Talk:Turkish Abductions

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Iceland Mid‑importance

	Iceland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iceland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iceland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IcelandWikipedia:WikiProject IcelandTemplate:WikiProject IcelandIceland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Piracy High‑importance

This article lies in the latitude of WikiProject Piracy, a crew of scurvy editors bound to sharpen up all Wikipedia's piracy-related articles. If you want to ship with us and help improve this and other Piracy-related articles, lay aboard the project page and sign on for a berth.PiracyWikipedia:WikiProject PiracyTemplate:WikiProject PiracyPiracy articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Piracy To-do:

Here are some tasks you can do to help with WikiProject Piracy:

Requests: John Lopez (pirate), Lords of the Spanish Main, Benjamin Bennett (governor) (see What links here), Thomas Walker (pirate), Richard Bishop (pirate)
Expand: Charles Vane, Edward England, Emanuel Wynn, George Lowther, Pierre Le Grand, Roche Braziliano, Thomas Cocklyn, Woodes Rogers, Piracy in the Indian Ocean
Verify: Daniel Johnson (pirate), Henry Jennings, François l'Olonnais, Olivier Levasseur, Edward Davis (buccaneer)
Copyedit: Golden Age of Piracy
Images: MV Delight, MV Powerful,

Numbers in the Turk raid

Someone has been quoting Wilson. Pirate Utopias, 2003, p. 100 to argue that there is a disagreement about the number of people seized in the raid, and that some say 400 whilst some say 8. This is a misreading of the English which implies that the difference is between 400 or 800 not 8. This is, in any case, a quote from a book by Gosse (not properly referenced by Wilson). Even a cursory examination of the primary texts shows that the figure assumed is not 8 (!). For goodness sake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.29.250.70 (talk) 10:57, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

target

There is no evidence that Reykjavik was pirated at the time, and in fact never, and it is also wrong that only young and fit people were abducted. At least the priest of Vestmannaeyjar was kidnapped, a man of age, and his wife, for the purpose of getting ransom for releasing them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.220.26.90 (talk) 09:13, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article name

Isn't the article title a bit of a misnomer? Seeing as how there were no Turks involved at all, it was a raid by Moroccan pirates under the command of a Dutch commander. Morocco was never under the jurisdiction of the Ottoman empire.Oxr033 (talk) 19:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Such distinctions were by no means always clear to Europeans -- especially not to those in Iceland! AnonMoos (talk) 12:33, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Majority disowned Christians"

M.Bitton, the source cited for this statement is from 1650 and it is not a source that is about this event, making it a clear synthesis of sources. I cannot find any modern sources making this claim. 194.105.229.170 (talk) 10:35, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The cited source supports the statement (there is no synthesis). Whether it's about this event or not is another matter. M.Bitton (talk) 23:57, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]